From a Philip Palin post at Homeland Security Watch (great blog, BTW):
I have just returned from twelve days of travel. When traveling I depend on my web-based algorithms for details and a scan of the Washington Post, New York Times, and San Francisco Chronicle homepages for a quick overview.
But nothing equals a real newspaper (and today too many printed versions can seem practically virtual) with a cup of coffee or a glass of wine and some quiet time to read, reflect, and connect those dots from pages A1, A6, C2, and the ad in the sports section.
I am barely half-way through a week-old Post and have already picked up a dozen valuable inputs that I would have otherwise lost.
I depend upon — and everyone who reads my posts depends upon — Daniel Fowler at CQ, Spencer Hsu at the Post, Eileen Sullivan at AP, Chris Strohm at the National Journal Group and others. Everyday I am simply silent regarding — and too often blatantly ignorant of — important information that these professionals are reporting out.
First, note the shout-out to a CQ Homeland Security reporter. Second, Palin outlines some rules he promises to follow. I think these should generally be followed by everyone in the blogosphere, as they would generally improve the fairness of the so-called “link economy” by generally giving credit where credit is due:
1. I will not just use links to attribute sources. I will consistently identify sources early and often in my text. I have been inconsistent in this regard.
2. I will use restraint in quoting from the work of others and, whenever possible, will deploy quotes in such a way to encourage accessing the original source. I hope I have usually done this.
3. I will acknowledge reporters by name, not just by the name of their employing organization. I will find opportunities to express appreciation. I have done this too seldom.
When reading my posts I ask that you access original resources and while you are there, give some quick consideration of the time, effort, and cost involved in generating the information provided to you, and even look at the advertisements. Consider it a secular version of doing the stations of the cross, to remind us that what is truly valuable almost always comes at considerable cost.
I realize I probably broke rule number two in creating this post.